AAP News Vol. 13 No. 5 May 1997, p. 29
© 1997 American Academy of Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koffler, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

DNA sampling, registry needed for child identification

Stephen Koffler M.D., FAAP

DNA is the only source of positive identification.

The U.S. military has been using DNA sampling and registry for the past five years on over 1.4 million GIs. The buccal swab method used by the military is fast, easy and accurate. In my mind, the logical, reasonable and responsible next step for medical professionals is to offer this protection to parents of newborns and infants, as well.

The need exists. The technology is readily available. And since 1983, the Academy and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology have advised against the use of infant finger and foot prints as means of positive identification.