AAP News Vol. 13 No. 9 September 1997, p. 14
© 1997 American Academy of Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reuben, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Managed care needs 'gate openers,' not 'gatekepers'

Mark Reuben M.D., FAAP

For half of my 20 years in pediatric practice, I have been intimately involved with medical liability issues and their effects on physicians, especially pediatricians. Having done an eight-year stint as a member and chair of the AAP Committee on Medical Liability (COML), and currently serving as the only pediatrician on the Pennsylvania Medical Society Liability Insurance Company (PMSLIC) board, I have observed the changes in liability issues that have, in many ways, paralleled the changes in medical practice.

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, supported by the Academy, has virtually eliminated vaccines as a liability issue for the practicing pediatrician. A single vaccine, the Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib) vaccine, has dramatically reduced most claims for meningitis complications. It is my distinct impression, although I lack the formal data to support it, that the movement of neonatologists into more nurseries has reduced "newborn" claims against pediatricians, although not against our Ob/Gyn colleagues.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Child Life Council and Committee on Hospital Care
Child Life Services
Pediatrics, October 1, 2006; 118(4): 1757 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]