AAP News Vol. 30 No. 6 June 2009, p. 28
© 2009 American Academy of Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bocchini, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 


INFECTIOUS DISEASE UPDATE

FDA eases restrictions on use of ceftriaxone in infants

John S. Bradley, M.D., FAAP

Joseph A. Bocchini, Jr., M.D., FAAP

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has modified its restrictions on the concomitant use of ceftriaxone and calcium-containing intravenous solutions in infants and children (www.fda.gov/Cder/drug/infopage/ceftriaxone/default.htm).

The recommendations ease restrictions issued in 2007 and are more focused on infants who appear to be at highest risk:

  • Concomitant use of ceftriaxone and intravenous calcium-containing products still is contraindicated in neonates (28 days of age or younger). Ceftriaxone should not be used in neonates (28 days of age and younger) receiving (or expected to receive) calcium-containing intravenous products.
  • Ceftriaxone and calcium-containing products may be used concomitantly in patients older than 28 days, using the following precautionary steps:
    – Ceftriaxone and calcium-containing intravenous products are administered sequentially, provided the infusion lines are thoroughly flushed between infusions with a compatible fluid.
    – Ceftriaxone must not be administered simultaneously with intravenous calcium-containing solutions via a Y-site in any age group.

Due to the long half-life of ceftriaxone, the 2007 FDA recommendation stated that ceftriaxone and calcium-containing products should not be administered within 48 hours of one another. This recommendation was rescinded in the new guidance, which is based on additional in vitro data on ceftriaxone/calcium interactions in serum, ongoing analysis of reported cases and ongoing review of safety data on ceftriaxone from the FDA MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program.

With reports of neonatal deaths associated with precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lung and/or kidneys, the FDA acted quickly to prevent morbidity and mortality in U.S. neonates and infants (www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2007/Rocephin_HCP_august2007.pdf). The agency issued a warning in 2007 indicating that concomitant administration of ceftriaxone and a calcium-containing intravenous solution was contraindicated in infants and children. With more detailed information subsequently available on the reported neonatal cases ( Bradley JS, Wassel RT, Lee L, Nambiar S. Pediatrics 2009;123:e609-613[Abstract/Free Full Text] ) and a recognition of the risks and benefits of ceftriaxone and alternative antibiotics in pediatric practice, the FDA issued the new recommendations.

Other potential interactions

According to the FDA, there still are no data on interactions between intravenous ceftriaxone and the oral calcium-containing products commonly prescribed for neonates and infants. There also are no new data to define the risk of intramuscular ceftriaxone and intravenous or oral calcium-containing products. The FDA is neither recommending against these uses nor is it saying they are safe.

However, in all of the reported cases of infant death, intravenous calcium and intravenous ceftriaxone were given. Therefore, practitioners should be aware of the potential interactions with oral calcium in young infants receiving intravenous ceftriaxone, and the potential side effects of intravenous or oral calcium in infants receiving intramuscular ceftriaxone. However, if the benefits of ceftriaxone therapy in these situations are felt to be greater than a small but yet-to-be-defined risk of concomitant therapy, then ceftriaxone can be used cautiously in these settings.

To help in the ongoing assessment of the adverse event profile of ceftriaxone, health care providers should report possible adverse events to MedWatch at www.fda.gov/medwatch/report/hcp.htm.

Dr. Bradley is a member of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases, and Dr. Bocchini is chair of the committee.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bocchini, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?